Guía internacional para una dosificación más segura de la clozapina en adultos mediante el uso de 6 titulaciones personalizadas de dosis basados en la etnicidad, la proteína C reactiva y los niveles de clozapina / An international adult guideline for making clozapine titration safer by using six ancestry-based personalized dosing titrations, CRP, and clozapine levels

Esta guía internacional propone mejorar los prospectos de la clozapina en todo el mundo mediante la inclusion de información sobre la titulación del fármaco en función de la ascendencia del paciente. Las bases de datos de reacciones adversas a medicamentos (RAM) sugieren que la clozapina es el tercer fármaco más tóxico en los Estados Unidos de América (EE. UU.) y que produce una mortalidad por neumonía en todo el mundo 4 veces mayor que la correspondiente a la agranulocitosis o la miocarditis. El rango terapéutico de referencia para las concentraciones séricas estables de clozapina es estrecho, de 350 a 600 ng/ml, con potencial de toxicidad y reacciones adversas más fecuentes a medida que aumentan las concentraciones. La clozapina se metaboliza principalmente por CYP1A2 (las mujeres no fumadoras requieren la dosis más baja y los hombres fumadores la dosis más alta). A través de la conversión fenotípica, la prescripción conjunta de inhibidores del metabolismo de la clozapina (incluidos los anticonceptivos orales y el valproato), la obesidad o la inflamación con elevaciones de la proteína C reactiva (PCR), pueden convertir al paciente en un metabolizador lento/pobre (MP). Las personas de ascendencia asiática (de Pakistán a Japón) o los habitantes originarios de las Américas tienen menor actividad de CYP1A2 y requieren dosis más bajas de clozapina para alcanzar concentraciones de 350 ng/ml. En los EE. UU. se recomiendan dosis diarias de 300-600 mg/día. La dosificación personalizada lenta puede prevenir RAM tempranas (incluidos el síncope, la miocarditis y la neumonía). La esencia de esta guía se fundamenta en 6 esquemas de titulaciones personalizadas para pacientes hospitalizados...(AU)

This is the Spanish translation of an international guideline which proposes improving clozapine package inserts worldwide by using ancestry-based: 1) dosing and 2) titration. Adverse drug reaction (ADR) databases suggest clozapine: 1) is the third most toxic drug in the United States (US), and 2) produces worldwide pneumonia mortality four times greater than that of agranulocytosis or myocarditis. For trough steady-state clozapine serum concentrations, the therapeutic reference range is narrow, from 350 to 600 ng/mL with the potential for toxicity and ADRs as concentrations increase. Clozapine is mainly metabolized by CYP1A2 (female non-smokers require the lowest dose and male smokers the highest dose). Poor metabolizer (PM) status through phenotypic conversion is associated with co-prescription of inhibitors (including oral contraceptives and valproate), obesity or inflammation with C-reactive protein (CRP) elevations. People with ancestry from Asia (Pakistan to Japan) or the Americas’ original inhabitants have lower CYP1A2 activity and require lower clozapine doses to reach concentrations of 350 ng/ml. Daily doses of 300-600 mg/day are recommended in the US. Slow personalized titration may prevent early ADRs (including syncope, myocarditis and pneumonia). The core of this guideline consists of six personalized titration schedules for inpatients...(AU)

The Impact of Clozapine Delay on Clinical Outcomes in Schizophrenia.

Background: Clozapine is the drug of choice indicated for treatment-resistant schizophrenia (TRS), but delays in initiation and underutilization might have affected its effectiveness in practice. In this study, we sought to examine the clinical outcomes of patients on clozapine treatment and if a delay in initiation was associated with poorer outcomes.Methods: This study was conducted at a tertiary mental health institution in patients aged 21 to 80 years from January 2016 to October 2019 who were on a stable dose of clozapine for 2 weeks. All patients were assessed using the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV-TR (SCID-I) to ascertain diagnoses of schizophrenia and schizoaffective disorder. Each patient was assessed on the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) and Social Occupational Functioning Assessment Scale (SOFAS). Past antipsychotic treatment trials were obtained from the medical records. Symptom remission status was defined using the PANSS symptom criteria proposed by Andreasen and colleagues in 2005. Functional remission was defined as a SOFAS score ≥ 60.Results: A total of 159 individuals with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder were recruited. The mean age of patients was 40.01 years, and the majority of patients were male (64.2%) and Chinese (85.5%). Thirty-seven patients (23.3%) achieved symptom remission, and 101 (63.5%) achieved functional remission. The median number of antipsychotic trials before clozapine initiation was 6 (interquartile range, 5-8). Patients in either symptom or functional remission had shorter time periods and fewer numbers of antipsychotic trials before first clozapine initiation. However, the trend was statistically significant only for median number of antipsychotic trials in the functional remission (P = .027) and symptom remission (P = .011) groups.Conclusion: Our study found a significant delay in the initiation of clozapine despite current guidelines indicating it for TRS. This delay might have contributed to the poorer clinical outcomes. Further research is needed to provide a clearer understanding of clozapine delay, evaluate its impact on outcomes, and find ways to improve access to clozapine.

Valproate, obesity and other causes of clozapine poor metabolism in the context of rapid titration may explain clozapine-induced myocarditis: A re-analysis of a Turkish case series / El valproato, la obesidad y otras causas de metabolismo deficiente de la clozapina en el contexto de una titulación rápida de las dosis pueden explicar la miocarditis inducida por clozapina: un nuevo análisis de una serie de casos turca

Introduction: Clozapine-induced myocarditis or any clozapine-induced inflammation may be a hypersensitivity reaction due to titration that was too rapid for the patient's clozapine metabolism. Clozapine metabolism is influenced by ancestry, sex, smoking and the presence of confounders including obesity, infections, and inhibitors (e.g., valproate) causing the patient to behave as a clozapine poor metabolizer (PM). A published study in a Turkish hospital identified 1 case of clozapine-induced pancreatitis and hepatitis and 9 cases of clozapine-induced myocarditis. To explore the hypothesis that the 10 patients were clozapine PMs, their serum clozapine concentrations were investigated using concentration-to-dose (C/D) ratios and their titrations carefully reviewed. Methods: Dividing the trough serum concentration by the dose produces the clozapine C/D ratio. The dose required to reach 350ng/ml was considered the minimum therapeutic dosage and was used to classify patients according to clozapine PM status. Titration speed was assessed. Results: All 10 patients were possibly clozapine PMs (3 of them had as minimum therapeutic doses: 72, 82 or 83mg/day). Nine of the 10 patients may have behaved as clozapine PMs due to obesity and/or valproate co-prescription during titration. One also had an undiagnosed infection. Of the 10 patients, 9 had at least 1 of 3 factors: too-rapid titration in the first or second weeks, or a final dosage that was too high. Conclusions: Future studies using clozapine levels and considering the role of clozapine PM status should explore whether or not all cases of clozapine-induced inflammation could be explained by lack of individualized titration. (AU)

Introducción: Cualquier inflamación inducida por la clozapina, incluida la miocarditis, podría ser una reacción de hipersensibilidad asociada a una titulación demasiado rápida de del fármaco para el metabolismo del paciente. El metabolismo de la clozapina está influenciado por la ascendencia, el sexo, el tabaquismo, y por la presencia de factores de confusión como obesidad, infecciones e inhibidores, como el valproato, que hacen que el paciente se comporte como un metabolizador lento (PM). Un estudio publicado identificó un caso de pancreatitis y hepatitis, y 9 casos de miocarditis inducidos por clozapina. Para explorar la hipótesis de que los 10 pacientes eran PM de clozapina, se investigaron sus concentraciones séricas de clozapina utilizando relaciones concentración/dosis (C/D) y revisando sus titulaciones. Métodos: La dosis necesaria para alcanzar 350ng/ml se consideró la dosis terapéutica mínima y clasificó a los pacientes según el estado de PM de clozapina. Se evaluó la velocidad de titulación. Resultados: Los 10 pacientes eran posiblemente PM de clozapina (3 tenían dosis terapéuticas mínimas: 72, 82 u 83mg/día). Nueve pacientes pueden haberse comportado como PM de clozapina debido a obesidad y/o prescripción conjunta de valproato durante la titulación. Uno también tenía una infección no diagnosticada. Nueve de los 10 pacientes tenían al menos uno de los 3 factores siguientes: titulación demasiado rápida en la primera o segunda semana, o una dosis final excesiva. Conclusiones: Futuros estudios que utilicen niveles de clozapina y consideren el PM deberían explorar si la inflamación inducida por clozapina podría explicarse por la falta de titulaciones individualizadas. (AU)

Alternative Routes of Administration of Clozapine.

Clozapine is the only antipsychotic with proven effectiveness in treatment-resistant schizophrenia. It is usually administered using commercially available oral tablets, but not all patients are willing or able to take medicines in this way. Orodispersible clozapine tablets are available from several manufacturers and may be useful where swallowing solid dosage forms is difficult, or as an aid to observe compliance. Liquid formulations of clozapine can be prepared extemporaneously or purchased commercially, but most preparations are suspensions (clozapine is poorly soluble) and patients may find them unpalatable. The administration of clozapine (suspension or crushed tablets) via enteral feeding tubes (predominantly nasogastric) has been reported both in medically unwell patients and in patients refusing clozapine. Enteral administration is likely to be superseded by intramuscular clozapine, which has recently been re-introduced and is being widely used in some countries. Successful use of this formulation in enforced treatment strategies has been described by several authors with good long-term outcomes when switched to oral treatment. Intramuscular clozapine has also been used in physically ill patients who are unable to take any form of enteral medication. Other methods of delivery (transdermal, nasal) are not yet commercially available, but offer promise of further treatment options for this group of seriously ill patients.

Incident infection during the first year of treatment - A comparison of clozapine and paliperidone palmitate long-acting injection.

BACKGROUND: To examine the risk of infection in patients prescribed clozapine compared with patients prescribed paliperidone palmitate long-acting injection (PPLAI). METHOD: A retrospective, 1-year, cohort study conducted on events occurring in eligible patients beginning treatment for the first time with clozapine or PPLAI between June 2017 and June 2019 in a UK mental health trust providing in-patient and out-patient services. RESULTS: The study included 64 patients starting clozapine and 120 patients starting PPLAI. Incidence of infection was greater in clozapine starters than in PPLAI starters (28% vs 6%; p = 0.001; adjusted odds ratio 5.82 (95% confidence interval (CI) = 2.15-15.76, p = 0.001). Infectious episodes in clozapine patients were not related to changes in neutrophil counts. Incident infection in the clozapine group was highest in the first 3 months of treatment. The most commonly reported infection in the clozapine group was chest infection; however, the majority of infections were non-chest-related. CONCLUSION: Patients starting clozapine showed a substantially increased likelihood of infection compared with patients starting PPLAI.

Reducing the Risk of Withdrawal Symptoms and Relapse Following Clozapine Discontinuation-Is It Feasible to Develop Evidence-Based Guidelines?

Clozapine is the only antipsychotic that is effective in treatment-resistant schizophrenia. However, in certain clinical situations, such as the emergence of serious adverse effects, it is necessary to discontinue clozapine. Stopping clozapine treatment poses a particular challenge due to the risk of psychotic relapse, as well as the development of withdrawal symptoms. Despite these challenges for the clinician, there is currently no formal guidance on how to safely to discontinue clozapine. We assessed the feasibility of developing evidence-based recommendations for (1) minimizing the risk of withdrawal symptoms, (2) managing withdrawal phenomena, and (3) commencing alternatives treatment when clozapine is discontinued. We then evaluated the recommendations against the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREE) II criteria. We produced 19 recommendations. The majority of these recommendation were evidence-based, although the strength of some recommendations was limited by a reliance of studies of medium to low quality. We discuss next steps in the refinement and validation of an evidence-based guideline for stopping clozapine and identify key outstanding questions.

The type rather than the daily dose or number of antipsychotics affects the incidence of hyperglycemic progression.

There have been concerns that antipsychotics increase the incidence of hyperglycemic progression. Many factors have been suggested to contribute to the risk of antipsychotic-induced hyperglycemic progression, including the type, daily dose, and number of antipsychotics; however, few studies have examined these relationships. This study aimed to examine the affect of antipsychotic treatment-associated factors on hyperglycemic progression, after adjustment for the affect of background factors suggested to be associated with hyperglycemic progression. This was a nationwide, multicenter, prospective cohort study examining the incidence of hyperglycemic progression during a 12 mo period following the initiation of newly prescribed antipsychotic medication. Demographic data, medication history, and blood test values were collected from 631 study participants with normal blood glucose levels at baseline for 12 mo. The primary endpoint (incidence of hyperglycemic progression) was defined as progression from normal to prediabetic or probable diabetic status, and was evaluated based on the Japanese monitoring guidance in patients with schizophrenia. To further examine the affect of antipsychotics on glucose metabolism over time, we examined changes in HbA1c levels 3, 6, and 12 mo after the initiation of treatment with each antipsychotic. We found that treatment with zotepine and clozapine was associated with a significantly high incidence of hyperglycemic progression. Furthermore, changes in HbA1c levels 6 mo after the initiation of zotepine treatment were significantly higher than those following blonanserin and haloperidol treatments. In contrast, there was no significant difference in the change in total cholesterol, triglycerides, HDL cholesterol, and BMI during the same period. Moreover, the "daily dose" and "number" of antipsychotics did not show an association with the incidence of hyperglycemic progression. However, in a post hoc analysis in which the antipsychotics were divided into two groups according to the strength of blockade of H1, M1, M3, and 5-HT2C receptors, the incidence of hyperglycemic progression was higher in the medium- and high-daily dose groups than in the low-daily dose group in the antipsychotic group with strong blockade of these receptors. Our study indicated that the type of antipsychotic had a greater affect on the incidence of hyperglycemic progression than the daily dose of antipsychotics or their number. Among these, zotepine was most likely to increase the incidence of hyperglycemic progression, suggesting the need for caution when these antipsychotics are prescribed.

Treatment-Resistant Schizophrenia: Definition, Predictors, and Therapy Options.

Treatment-resistant schizophrenia (TRS) represents a major clinical challenge. The broad definition of TRS requires nonresponse to at least 2 sequential antipsychotic trials of sufficient dose, duration, and adherence. Several demographic, clinical, and neurologic predictors are associated with TRS. Primary (or early) TRS is present from the beginning of therapy, while patients with secondary (or later-onset) TRS initially respond to antipsychotics but become resistant over time, often after relapses. Guidelines worldwide recognize clozapine as the most effective treatment option for TRS, but clozapine is underused due to various barriers. Importantly, studies indicate that response rates are higher when clozapine is initiated earlier in the treatment course. Side effects are common with clozapine, particularly in the first few weeks, but can mostly be managed without discontinuation; they do require proactive assessment, intervention, and reassurance for patients. Furthermore, plasma leucocyte and granulocyte levels must be monitored weekly during the first 18-26 weeks of treatment, and regularly thereafter, according to country regulations. Therapeutic drug monitoring of clozapine trough plasma levels is helpful to guide dosing, with greatest efficacy at plasma clozapine levels ≥350 µg/L, although this level is not universal. Notably, plasma clozapine levels are generally greater at lower doses in nonsmokers, patients with heavy caffeine consumption, in women, in obese people, in those with inflammation (including COVID-19 infection), and in older individuals. Earlier and broader use of clozapine in patients with TRS is an important measure to improve outcomes of patients with this most severe form of the illness.

Chemogenetic modulation of histaminergic neurons in the tuberomamillary nucleus alters territorial aggression and wakefulness.

Designer receptor activated by designer drugs (DREADDs) techniques are widely used to modulate the activities of specific neuronal populations during behavioural tasks. However, DREADDs-induced modulation of histaminergic neurons in the tuberomamillary nucleus (HATMN neurons) has produced inconsistent effects on the sleep-wake cycle, possibly due to the use of Hdc-Cre mice driving Cre recombinase and DREADDs activity outside the targeted region. Moreover, previous DREADDs studies have not examined locomotor activity and aggressive behaviours, which are also regulated by brain histamine levels. In the present study, we investigated the effects of HATMN activation and inhibition on the locomotor activity, aggressive behaviours and sleep-wake cycle of Hdc-Cre mice with minimal non-target expression of Cre-recombinase. Chemoactivation of HATMN moderately enhanced locomotor activity in a novel open field. Activation of HATMN neurons significantly enhanced aggressive behaviour in the resident-intruder test. Wakefulness was increased and non-rapid eye movement (NREM) sleep decreased for an hour by HATMN chemoactivation. Conversely HATMN chemoinhibition decreased wakefulness and increased NREM sleep for 6 h. These changes in wakefulness induced by HATMN modulation were related to the maintenance of vigilance state. These results indicate the influences of HATMN neurons on exploratory activity, territorial aggression, and wake maintenance.

Therapeutic drug monitoring of clozapine in adults with schizophrenia: a review of challenges and strategies.

INTRODUCTION: Clozapine (CLZ) is the superior drug in treatment of schizophrenia. Serum concentration of CLZ is associated with clinical response and dose-dependents side effects, where generalized tonic-clonic seizures are most critical. Thus, therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of CLZ may guide individual dosing to reach target exposure and prevent dose-dependent side effects. However, current TDM methods are not capable of predicting the risk of agranulocytosis, which is a dose-independent side effect restricting use of CLZ to treatment-resistant schizophrenia (TRS). AREAS COVERED: The article provides an overview of clinical, pharmacological, and toxicological aspects of CLZ, and the role of TDM as a tool for dose titration and follow-up in patients with TRS. Main focus is on current challenges and strategies in CLZ TDM, including future perspectives on potential identification/analysis of CLZ metabolite biomarkers reflecting the risk of granulocyte toxicity. EXPERT OPINION: The association between CLZ serum concentration, clinical response and risk of seizures is indisputable. TDM should therefore always guide CLZ dose titration. Development of advanced TDM methods, including biomarkers predicting the risk of granulocyte toxicity might extend TDM to be a tool for deciding which patients that can be treated safely with CLZ, potentially increasing its utility beyond TRS.

Absolute and Dose-Adjusted Serum Concentrations of Clozapine in Patients Switching vs. Maintaining Treatment: An Observational Study of 1979 Patients.

BACKGROUND: Clozapine is an effective drug for the management of schizophrenia that has not responded to other agents, but some patients experience insufficient or adverse effects and discontinue treatment. OBJECTIVE: We investigated a potential association between clozapine serum concentrations and switching to other antipsychotics in a large real-world patient population from a therapeutic drug monitoring service. METHODS: Absolute and dose-adjusted serum concentrations (concentration-to-dose ratios [C/D ratios]) of clozapine during dosing between 100 and 1000 mg/day were measured in 1979 Norwegian patients during the period 2005-2019. These variables were compared in patients switching to other antipsychotic drugs versus maintaining clozapine treatment using linear mixed models. Smoking habits were known for 49% of the patients. To prevent potential nonadherence affecting clozapine switching, only patients with serum concentrations above 50% of the lower reference range were included. RESULTS: In total, 190 patients (9.6%) switched from clozapine to another antipsychotic drug during the study period, whereas the remaining patients were not detected as switchers and were interpreted as maintaining treatment. Patients switching treatment had 23.5% lower absolute concentrations (954 vs. 1245 nmol/L; p < 0.001) and 15.7% lower daily doses (305 vs. 362 mg/day; p < 0.001) of clozapine than did nonswitchers, making the clozapine C/D ratio 9.7% lower in switchers than in nonswitchers after correcting for smoking habits (2.80 vs. 3.10 nmol/L/mg/day; p = 0.032). CONCLUSIONS: The present study suggests that decreased absolute and dose-adjusted serum concentrations of clozapine were associated with clozapine discontinuation. The significantly reduced clozapine concentrations regardless of prescribed dose in switchers versus nonswitchers may indicate a pharmacokinetic mechanism underlying the risk of clozapine discontinuation.

Brain targeting efficiency of intranasal clozapine-loaded mixed micelles following radio labeling with Technetium-99m.

The research objective is to design intranasal (IN) brain targeted CLZ-loaded polymeric nanomicellar systems (PNMS) aiming to improve central systemic CLZ bioavailability. Direct equilibrium method was used to prepare CLZ-PNMS using two hydrophobic poloxamines; Tetronic® 904 (T904) and Tetronic® 701 (T701) and one hydrophilic poloxamer; Synperonic® PE/F127 (F127). Optimization is based on higher percent transmittance, solubilizing efficiency, and in vitro release after 24 h with smaller particle size was achieved using Design-Expert® software. The optimized formula was further evaluated via TEM, ex vivo nasal permeation in addition to in vivo biodistribution using radiolabeling technique of the optimized formula by Technetium-99m (99mTc). The optimized formula M5 has small size (217 nm) with relative high percentage of transmittance (97.72%) and high solubilization efficacy of 60.15-fold following 92.79% of CLZ released after 24 h. Ex vivo nasal permeation showed higher flux of 36.62 µg/cm2.h compared to 7.324 µg/cm2.h for CLZ suspension with no histological irritation. In vivo biodistribution results showed higher values of radioactivity percentage of the labeled optimized formula (99mTc-M5) in brain and brain/blood ratio following IN administration of 99mTc-M5 complex which were greater than their corresponding values following intravenous route. It is obvious that nasal delivery of CLZ-PNMS could be a promising way to improve central systemic CLZ bioavailability.

Clozapine rechallenge following neutropenia using granulocyte colony-stimulating factor: A Quebec case series.

BACKGROUND: Clozapine has a unique efficacy profile among individuals suffering from treatment-resistant schizophrenia, but is associated with hematological side effects. The use of granulocyte colony-stimulating factors (G-CSF) to allow clozapine continuation or rechallenge has emerged as a promising option, but evidence is still scarce. AIM: To describe the largest case series so far published regarding this practice. METHOD: A national clozapine hematological monitoring database was consulted to identify all patients who had had neutrophil count <1.5 × 109/L since 2004 in Quebec and was cross-referenced with hospital pharmacy software to identify patients who had received at least one dose of G-CSF, such as filgrastim, while being exposed to clozapine. All data were collected retrospectively, using patients' medical files, from January to July 2019. RESULTS: Using G-CSF, three out of eight patients could maintain clozapine despite neutropenia episodes that otherwise would have required treatment discontinuation. The only side effect reported was mild short-lived back pain, over a mean 3-year follow-up period. In all but one case, filgrastim was used on an "as-needed" basis at doses of 300 mcg administered subcutaneously. CONCLUSION: These results suggest that the "as-needed" use of G-CSF is well-tolerated and may allow clozapine rechallenge in some well-selected patients, adding to the paucity of data regarding long-term safety and efficacy of this strategy. More research may help to better define potential candidates and optimal regimen of such practice.

Effects on suicidal risk: Comparison of clozapine to other newer medicines indicated to treat schizophrenia or bipolar disorder.

BACKGROUND: Clozapine is the only treatment with regulatory-recognition of lowering suicidal risk, at least in schizophrenia patients. It remains uncertain whether such effects extend to other drugs for psychosis. METHODS: We searched for reports on rates of suicidal behavior during treatment with clozapine and other modern drugs for psychosis (aripiprazole, olanzapine, risperidone, quetiapine, and ziprasidone) versus comparison or control treatments and analyzed the contrasts by random-effect meta-analysis to obtain pooled odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). RESULTS: We identified 35 paired comparisons of modern drugs for psychosis versus comparison or control treatments in 18 reports. There was moderate overall superiority of all agents tested over alternatives (OR = 0.522, p = 0.004). With clozapine, this effect was large (OR = 0.229, p < 0.0001) and consistent (7/7 trials), but significant antisuicidal effects were not found with other drugs for psychosis in 28 other trials (OR = 0.941, p = 0.497). Apparent efficacy of specific agents ranked: risperidone ⩾ olanzapine ⩾ aripiprazole ⩾ ziprasidone ⩾ mixed drugs for psychosis ⩾ quetiapine, but none of these differences was significant. CONCLUSIONS: An ability of clozapine to reduce risk of suicides and attempts in schizophrenia patients appears to be a unique effect not shared with other modern medicines indicated for schizophrenia or bipolar disorder.

What about regular hematological monitoring during clozapine treatment? A compliance analysis using the French health insurance database.

BACKGROUND: The inherent risk of agranulocytosis associated with clozapine requires the realization of weekly white blood cell monitoring (WBCM) during the 18 first weeks of treatment. The aim of this study was to assess the compliance with WBCM during clozapine initiation for schizophrenia and Parkinson's disease (PD) subjects. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHOD: The analysis was conducted using SNDS data on a cohort of new users of clozapine in 2018. We analyzed all reimbursements for WBCM from 2 weeks before the index date to 18 weeks after (optimal monitoring during hospitalization was assumed). The primary outcome was the proportion of good realization of WBCM according to different thresholds of completion (70%; 80%; 90%). Descriptive and comparative analyses with chi-squared test or Student's t-test were performed. RESULTS: Two hundred and ninety-six subjects were included. Rates of patients with WBCM realization over 70%, 80%, and 90% of WBCM expected were, respectively, 78.1%, 70.0%, and 56.9% for subjects with schizophrenia and 71.3%, 63.2%, and 47.8% for PD subjects. Only hospitalization during the follow-up period for schizophrenia subjects was significantly associated with good WBCM realization. CONCLUSIONS: We observed rather good results for compliance with clozapine initial monitoring. Other studies are needed to confirm our results.

Unravelling cases of clozapine-related Drug Reaction with Eosinophilia and Systemic Symptoms (DRESS) in patients reported otherwise: A systematic review.

BACKGROUND: The drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS) syndrome is a drug-induced hypersensitivity reaction. AIMS: Aim was to review reports of clozapine-related reactions fulfilling the registry of severe cutaneous adverse reaction (RegiSCAR) criteria for DRESS syndrome reported as such or otherwise, to provide a descriptive overview of demographic patterns, clinical manifestations, and DRESS course and investigate associations between demographic, DRESS parameters, and clinical outcomes. METHODS: This review was conducted following preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses guidelines and registered with PROSPERO (registration number CRD42020156385). We searched PubMed/Embase/PsychInfo/Cochrane for reports of clozapine-related reactions meeting RegiSCAR criteria. Associations between RegiSCAR scores and time-to-recovery with demographic/clinical variables were assessed. Demographic/clinical characteristics of patients with versus without reported DRESS were compared using non-parametrical tests. RESULTS: We identified 26 reports of 27 patients meeting RegiSCAR criteria. Males (n = 19, 70.4%) and patients with schizophrenia (n = 18, 66.7%) were mainly affected. Twelve patients (44.4%) received clozapine-monotherapy. DRESS symptoms manifested within a month after clozapine initiation (n = 24, 88.9%). Lungs and liver were the most common organs involved (n = 12, 44.4%; n = 11, 40.7%), with a mean time to recovery of 33.75 days. Clozapine rechallenge led to DRESS recurrence in four patients. Death rate was 7.4%. No associations were detected between RegiSCAR criteria or days to recovery with any demographic/clinical variables. No differences between patients with versus without reported DRESS were detected. CONCLUSIONS: Clozapine-related DRESS may be rare, but also underreported. Clinicians need to be aware of it even in patients under clozapine-monotherapy or without skin rash.

Effects on monotherapy and reduction of antipsychotic drugs by clozapine therapy in Japanese patients with treatment-resistant schizophrenia.

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE: The schizophrenia guidelines in Japan and many other countries describe clozapine as the first-choice drug for patients with treatment-resistant schizophrenia. However, there have been no reports to date on the effects of the introduction of clozapine on the prescription of other antipsychotics and concomitant drugs. METHODS: In this study, we retrospectively investigated the prescription of antipsychotics and concomitant drugs before vs 6 months after and 12 months after switching to clozapine. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: Clozapine was introduced to 62 patients with treatment-resistant schizophrenia, and 51 patients continued on clozapine therapy. Six months after switching to clozapine, there was a significant decrease in the mean number of antipsychotic drugs (2.04 ± 0.75 vs 1.10 ± 0.30: p < 0.001) and in the mean chlorpromazine equivalent value (1024 ± 73 mg/day vs 781 ± 391 mg/day: p < 0.001) compared to before switching. Moreover, antipsychotic monotherapy increased from 24% to 90% after switching to clozapine. In addition, the number of concomitant benzodiazepines, anti-parkinson drugs and antidepressants also significantly decreased 6 and 12 months after switching to clozapine (p < 0.001 for benzodiazepines and anti-parkinson drugs, and p < 0.05 for antidepressants). WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION: Our study suggests that switching to clozapine may reduce the use of antipsychotic combination therapy, and may also reduce the number of concomitant drugs.